Blog

The Bankruptcy Law Firm, Prof. Corp.

American Bankruptcy Institute reports the following on 02/23/23

By Los Angeles Bankruptcy Attorney on February 24, 2023

Additional Chapter 7 Trustee Payments Suspended for FY 2022 The Department of Justice (DOJ) has advised the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts that it has insufficient funds available to transfer to the Judiciary to make additional payments to eligible chapter 7 bankruptcy trustees for fiscal year 2022, according to a U.S. Courts press release. Trustees interested in receiving the additional payments for fiscal year 2023 should still file payment eligibility certifications. The Bankruptcy Administration Improvement Act of 2020 (BAIA) established an additional payment for eligible chapter 7 trustees for fiscal years 2021 to 2026. The payments are funded by…

Posted in: News

Bartenwerfer v. Buckley, 598 U. S. ___ (United States Supreme Court 2/22/2023)

By Los Angeles Bankruptcy Attorney on February 23, 2023

Bartenwerfer v. Buckley, 598 U. S. ___ (United States Supreme Court 2/22/2023): On February 22, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its unanimous opinion in Bartenwerfer v. Buckley, 598 U. S. ___ (2023) (honest debtor/business partner/wife could not discharge claim arising from fraud of dishonest partner/husband under 11 U.S.C. §523(a)(2)(A), even though the debtor did now know of the partner’s fraud). In the opinion of The Bankruptcy Law Firm, PC, this decision is very surprising, and we think is wrong, because the more reasonable interpretation of 11 U.S.C. §523(a)(2)(A) is to interpret that section of the Bankruptcy Code as only…

Posted in: Recent Cases

CFPB Targets Credit Card Late Fees As Junk Fees, Proposes Significant Reduction In Safe Harbor

By Los Angeles Bankruptcy Attorney on February 11, 2023

For Card Issuers: The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s (the “CFPB” or the “Bureau”) latest move in its crusade against “junk fees” may hit closer to home for companies charging common fees that are considered, to date, to be lawful and valid. On February 1, the Bureau issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking1 (the “Proposed Rule”) targeting credit card late fees that would have substantial implications for the consumer credit card industry across essentially all credit bands and submarkets. Consumer credit card issuers currently are subject to a statutory prohibition against unreasonable penalty fees such as late fees.2 However, regulations implementing…

Posted in: News

In re Piskiel, ___BR___ (Bankr. D.N.Mex 2-10-23), bky case no. 21-10717, discusses that Survivor’s Benefits Under a Pension Plan Might Not Become Property of the Bankruptcy Debtor’s “bankruptcy estate”

By Los Angeles Bankruptcy Attorney on February 11, 2023

Unlike Clark v. Rameker, where an inherited IRA wasn’t exempt, the inheritance of benefits under a pension plan might not become estate property under Section 541(c)(2). Although the Supreme Court held in Clark v. Rameker, 573 U.S. 122 (2014), that an inherited individual retirement account is not exempt, the inheritance of survivor’s benefits under a pension plan can be excluded from a debtor’s bankrupt estate, for reasons explained by Bankruptcy Judge David T. Thuma of Albuquerque, N.M. In his February 10 opinion, Judge Thuma wasn’t required to decide whether the debtor’s survivor’s benefit was exempt. The debtor’s father worked for…

Posted in: Recent Cases

CFPB: 18% Drop Since 2020 in People with Reported Medical Debt

By Los Angeles Bankruptcy Attorney on February 10, 2023

The number of people with medical debt on their credit reports fell by 8.2 million — or 17.9% — between 2020 and 2022, according to a report Tuesday from the U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), the Associated Press reported. White House officials said in a separate draft report that the two-year drop likely stems from their policies. Among the programs they say contributed to less debt was an expansion of the Obama-era health care law that added 4.2 million people with some form of health insurance. In addition, local governments are leveraging $16 million in coronavirus relief funds to…

Posted in: News

United States Federal Reserve reports that U.S. Household Debt Jumps to $16.90 Trillion in 4th Quarter of 2022

By Los Angeles Bankruptcy Attorney on February 9, 2023

U.S. household debt jumped to a record $16.90 trillion from October through December last year, the largest quarterly increase in 20 years, as mortgage and credit card balances surged amid high inflation and rising interest rates, a Federal Reserve report showed on Thursday, Reuters reported. Household debt, which rose by $394 billion last quarter, is now $2.75 trillion higher than just before the COVID-19 pandemic began while the increase in credit card balances last December from one year prior was the largest since records began in 1999, the New York Fed’s quarterly household debt report also said. Mortgage debt increased…

Posted in: News

Credit Card Debt Reaches A Record High Among U.S. Consumers reports 1/9/23 Credit & Collection E-Newsletter

By Los Angeles Bankruptcy Attorney on January 10, 2023

Personal loans and credit card debt reached record levels in 2022 due to financial pressures brought on by high inflation and climbing interest rates, according to third-quarter data from a consumer credit reporting agency. Credit balances reached a record-setting $866 billion in the third quarter of last year – and they are expected to keep climbing, the report from TransUnion said. Meanwhile, personal loan originations are expected to return to pre-pandemic levels in 2023, after experiencing record growth in the last 12 months. Michele Raneri, vice president of research and consulting at TransUnion, said that despite mounting financial pressures, there’s…

Posted in: News

Harris v. Creditmax Collection Agency Inc. (In re Warsco), ___F4th___(7th Cir. Jan. 9, 2023) appeal 22-1733

By Los Angeles Bankruptcy Attorney on January 10, 2023

Date of a Garnishment Order Doesn’t Matter for Preferences, Seventh Circuit Says; Its date of payment that determines whether payment is made in more than or less than 90 days before bky filed Circuit Judge Frank Easterbrook tersely held that the Supreme Court’s Barnhill opinion overruled prior Seventh Circuit precedent. Overruling the Seventh Circuit’s own 1984 precedent in deference to the later-decided Barnhill v. Johnson, 503 U.S. 393 (1992), Circuit Judge Frank H. Easterbrook held that a judgment creditor is liable for a preference if the creditor collects on a garnishment within the 90-day preference window. Even though the garnishment…

Posted in: Recent Cases

Unlike in the Eleventh Circuit, Barton doctrine Is Alive and Well in the Fifth Circuit

By Los Angeles Bankruptcy Attorney on January 9, 2023

In a case irreconcilable with two recent opinions from the Eleventh Circuit, the Fifth Circuit invokes Barton to bar a lawsuit against a trustee after the bankruptcy case had been closed. A stalwart defender of the Barton doctrine (that bankruptcy trustees cannot be sued without permission of bankruptcy court that appointed the trustee), the US Fifth Circuit Court of Appeal parted company with the US Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeal, by permitting a bankruptcy trustee to invoke Barton v. Barbour, 104 U.S. 126 (1881), and prevail on the bankruptcy court to dismiss a suit brought against the trustee in state…

Posted in: News

American Bankruptcy Institute (“ABI”) reports that as of 1/1/23, 3 different lower level Courts have ordered the Office of US Trustee to Refund, to Bankruptcy Debtors, Increased US Trustee Fees that the Office of US Trustee charged debtors, but which the US Supreme Court held to be illegal in Siegel v. Fitzgerald (2022 decision)

By Los Angeles Bankruptcy Attorney on January 2, 2023

All three courts to confront the question have now ordered the government to refund overpayments of U.S. Trustee fees. Last term, the Supreme Court held in Siegel v. Fitzgerald, 142 S. Ct. 1770 (Sup. Ct. June 6, 2022), that the 2018 increase in fees paid by chapter 11 debtors to the U.S. Trustee System was unconstitutional because it was not immediately applicable in the two states with Bankruptcy Administrators rather than U.S. Trustees. The Supreme Court left open the question of whether debtors are entitled to refunds. Id. at 1783. To read ABI’s report on Siegel, click here. Now, three…

Posted in: News