Masingale v. Muding (In re Masingale), ___BR___ (9th Cir. BAP 11/2/22), appeal 22-1016
Masingale v. Muding (In re Masingale), ___BR___ (9th Cir. BAP 11/2/22), appeal 22-1016; for publication 9th Cir BAP decision is important, because BAP rules that by claiming exemption of ‘100% of FMV’ of asset (usually homestead exemption, but could be something like stock) debtors keep postpetition appreciation in exempt assets.
Note that for debtors in California, using California exemptions, this result is the result required by the amended California exemption law, which takes effect for bankruptcy cases filed after 1/21/23.