Blog

The Bankruptcy Law Firm, Prof. Corp.

Trump administration identifies more borrowers eligible for student loan forgiveness, court filing shows

By Los Angeles Bankruptcy Attorney on February 20, 2026

CNBC on 2/17/26 reports that: Key Points The Trump administration identified more than 40,000 borrowers eligible for federal student loan forgiveness in January, according to a recent court filing. Borrowers became eligible for the debt cancellation under the terms of their repayment plan or through Public Service Loan Forgiveness. “We have several clients who got the ‘golden email’ this month,” said Nancy Nierman, assistant director of the Education Debt Consumer Assistance Program in New York. The Trump administration has identified more than 40,000 borrowers eligible for federal student loan forgiveness in January, a recent court filing revealed. More than 10,800…

Posted in: News

Herlihy v. DBMP LLC, 24-2109 (4th Cir. Feb. 11, 2026): Over Dissent Again, Fourth Circuit Allows Mass Tort Reorgs Without Financial Distress

By Los Angeles Bankruptcy Attorney on February 18, 2026

Fourth Circuit needs to sit en banc before deciding whether Carolin and Robbins apply when the debtor is not in financial distress. For the fourth time, Circuit Judge Robert Bruce King has filed a vigorous dissent imploring his colleagues on the Fourth Circuit to sit en banc and reconsider whether the circuit’s Carolin and Robbins decisions permit chapter 11 reorganization by solvent debtors able to pay tort claims in full. As he had done twice last year in Bestwall dissents, Judge King said that “our Circuit has become the ‘safe haven’ for ultra-wealthy corporations seeking to evade asbestos-related civil tort…

Posted in: Recent Cases

Wilson v. JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A., 24-6897 (9th Cir. Feb. 5, 2026)

By Los Angeles Bankruptcy Attorney on February 17, 2026

Wilson v. JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A., 24-6897 (9th Cir. Feb. 5, 2026), a new 9th circuit decision in a bky case, about 3 things required for appellate ct to hear an appeal of an interlocutory order: Just because an order was ‘final’ for an appeal in district court doesn’t mean there is jurisdiction for a second appeal if the district court remands. Ninth Circuit Covers the 3 ‘Hooks’ for Appellate Jurisdiction over Interlocutory Orders As demonstrated by an opinion from the Ninth Circuit, the fact that the district court had appellate jurisdiction over a final order doesn’t necessarily mean that…

Posted in: Recent Cases

Evolution Credit Partners v. First Brands Group LLC (In re First Brands Group LLC), 26-73 (S.D. Tex. Jan. 31, 2026)

By Los Angeles Bankruptcy Attorney on February 5, 2026

Cash Collateral Motions Can’t Rule on the Validity/Invalidity of a Secured Claim So long as the lender has made a prima facie showing of lien validity, the lender is entitled to adequate protection, a Houston district judge says. If a secured creditor makes a prima facie showing that the security interest in valid, the creditor “is entitled to adequate protection [for the use of cash collateral] until an adversary proceeding determines the validity, extent, and priority of the asserted property interest,” according to an appellate ruling by District Judge Lee H. Rosenthal of Houston. Judge Rosenthal’s January 31 opinion means…

Posted in: Recent Cases

Coney Island Auto Parts Unlimited Inc. v. Burton

By Los Angeles Bankruptcy Attorney on January 22, 2026

Coney Island Auto Parts Unlimited Inc. v. Burton Coney Island Auto Parts Unlimited Inc. v. Burton, 24-808 (U.S.Sup. Ct. Jan. 20, 2026): This 1/20/26 US Supreme Court decision–, which puts a time limit of “a reasonable time” to move, pursuant to FRCP Rule 60(b)(4), to set aside a void US District Court judgment, will also apply in Bankruptcy Court. This is because in Bankruptcy Court, FRBP Rule 9024 (relief from judgment or order) states that FRCP Rule 60 applies, except for the few exceptions stated in FRBP Rule 9024(a)(1), (2) & (3). Here is analysis of this US Supreme Court…

Posted in: Recent Cases

In re Vaughan, ___-bk-___ (Bankr. Court S.D. Ohio Jan. 2, 2026), bankruptcy case no. 25-31806:

By Los Angeles Bankruptcy Attorney on January 13, 2026

Because dismissal under Section 521(i)(1) is automatic and does not result from an order, there’s no rule to vacate dismissal for excusable neglect. One of the BAPCPA amendments in 2005, Section 521(i)(1), is unforgiving. If a chapter 13 case is dismissed automatically for failure to file all required papers within 45 days, the bankruptcy court has no power to set aside dismissal under the Bankruptcy Code or the Bankruptcy Rules, for reasons explained in a January 2 opinion by Bankruptcy Judge Tyson A. Crist of Dayton, Ohio. With counsel, the debtor filed a skeletal chapter 13 petition. The court entered…

Posted in: Recent Cases

Reduction in Regulation/Supervision/Oversight of “Payday” Loans

By Los Angeles Bankruptcy Attorney on December 23, 2025

Credit & Collection e-newsletter of 12/23/25 reports reduction in regulation/supervision/oversight of “payday” loans (also known as “paycheck loans”, and “payday advance” loans). That reduction in regulation/supervision/oversight of “payday” loans creates a BIG RISK to people taking out such “payday advance” loans, to survive until their next paycheck, because the loan documents will not be clear regarding what interest rate/fees the lenders are charging on such loans: Here is the article: The CFPB has issued a new advisory opinion saying that most “earned wage” or paycheck advance products are not covered by the federal Truth in Lending Act (TILA), meaning many…

Posted in: News

In re USA Cricket, 25-16318 (Bankr. D. Colo. Dec. 15, 2025):

By Los Angeles Bankruptcy Attorney on December 22, 2025

Some courts have said that Sub V status can be revoked involuntarily by the court in ‘narrow circumstances.’ If the Code doesn’t authorize the court to “convert” a Subchapter V case to a “regular” chapter 11, what relief can the court give when the debtor is dysfunctional? Is the court limited to dismissing the Subchapter V case, converting to chapter 7 or expanding the powers of the Subchapter V trustee? That’s a question answered by Bankruptcy Judge Michael E. Romero of Denver in a December 15 opinion. The corporate debtor had elected to proceed as a small business under Subchapter…

Posted in: Recent Cases

Student Loan Forgiveness

By Los Angeles Bankruptcy Attorney on December 19, 2025

American Bankruptcy Institute (“ABI”) article reports that a Court filing alleges that the US Education Department is Moving Slowly on Student Loan Forgiveness, and has a large backlog of requests from student loan borrowers for income-driven repayment plans, to repay the borrowers US Dept of Education school loans: Plan Backlog The Trump administration continues to move slowly in processing a massive backlog of applications from hundreds of thousands of student loan borrowers seeking debt forgiveness or an affordable repayment plan, a new court filing shows, CNBC.com reported. As of the end of November, 802,730 requests to transfer into an income-driven…

Posted in: News

Royal Street Bistro LLC v. Arrowhead Capital Finance Ltd. (In re Royal Street Bistro LLC)

By Los Angeles Bankruptcy Attorney on November 26, 2025

Royal Street Bistro LLC v. Arrowhead Capital Finance Ltd. (In re Royal Street Bistro LLC), 24-30732 (5th Cir. Nov. 17, 2025), the US Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit rules that an appellant’s failure to attach a copy of the judgment the appellant is appealing, to the appellant’s notice of appeal, is not ‘so egregious’ as to warrant dismissal of the appeal. Failing to attach a copy of the judgment to the notice of appeal isn’t jurisdictional and isn’t grounds in itself for dismissing an appeal, the Fifth Circuit said in a November 17 opinion. In a lawsuit in…

Posted in: Recent Cases